Atlanto-axial instability
in
Down syndrome
Richard
W. Newton M.D., F.R.C.P.
Consultant
Paediatric Neurologist,
Royal Manchester Children’s
Hospital, Pendlebury,
Manchester
Abstract
- The spinal column (back
bone) is a stack of specially
shaped bones, each one
moving on the one beneath.
The movement occurs at
a number of joints and
the stability of these
joints relies on the strength
of the ligaments joining
the bones and the tone
of the muscles which straddle
the bones. The spinal
cord is a trunk of thousands
of nerve cells which carry
information from the brain
to muscles in the arms,
legs and trunk. The spinal
cord lies in a hole running
through the centre of
each vertebra in the spinal
column. In Down syndrome
ligaments tend to be lax
and muscle tone is often
low. This gives one vertebra
the potential to move
to a greater extent on
its neighbour than is
seen in the average person.
As a consequence the nerve
cells of the spinal cord
can become distorted and
injured.
Keywords
- Down Syndrome, Atlanto-axial
instability
Introduction
The
spinal column (back bone)
is a stack of specially
shaped bones, each one
moving on the one beneath.
The movement occurs at
a number of joints and
the stability of these
joints relies on the strength
of the ligaments joining
the bones and the tone
of the muscles which straddle
the bones. The spinal
cord is a trunk of thousands
of nerve cells which carry
information from the brain
to muscles in the arms,
legs and trunk. The spinal
cord lies in a hole running
through the centre of
each vertebra in the spinal
column.
In
Down syndrome ligaments
tend to be lax and muscle
tone is often low. This
gives one vertebra the
potential to move to a
greater extent on its
neighbour than is seen
in the average person.
As a consequence the nerve
cells of the spinal cord
can become distorted and
injured.
The
greatest potential for
this movement is right
at the top of the spinal
column at the joint that
lies between the first
vertebra (atlas) which
supports the base of the
skull and the second vertebra
(axis) which allows side
to side pivoting of the
atlas and skull on its
specially designed joint
surface. This special
design involves a bony
spur known as the odontoid
peg passing upwards from
the body of the axis into
the body of the atlas.
If the atlas moves too
much on the axis the odontoid
peg is particularly well
placed to cause injury
to the spinal cord.
The
tendency of the atlas
to move on the axis is
known as atlanto-axial
instability. If the movement
is so great that one joint
surface falls off the
next this is known as
atlanto-axial dislocation
or subluxation and in
this circumstance the
risk of spinal cord damage
is very high indeed.
In
June 1994 a number of
doctors gathered at the
Royal Society of Medicine
to hold a seminar on the
subject of atlanto-axial
instability. The main
speakers were Richard
Newton, Paediatric Neurologist
from the Manchester Children’s
Hospitals, Richard Morton,
Paediatrician from Derby
Children’s Hospital,
Marike Cremers, a Specialist
in Public Health from
Holland and Mr. McKin
Thomas, an Orthopaedic
Surgeon from Nottingham.
This session was chaired
by Professor Sir David
Hull, immediate Past President
of the British Paediatric
Association.
The
notes presented here represent
the key facts presented
on that day:
1. Atlanto-axial instability,
defined radiologically
as an atlanto-axial distance
greater than 4.4mm in
flexion, has been reported
in between 10% and 40%
of people with Down syndrome.
The incidence decreases
with age.
2. People with Down syndrome
are at increased risk
of neurological problems
secondary to atlanto-axial
instability.
3. Acute subluxation of
the atlanto-axial joint
rarely occurs without
prior warning, clinical
signs and symptoms. In
most published cases of
spinal cord injury, symptoms
of neck pain, limitation
of neck movement, increasing
difficulty with walking
or bladder and bowel difficulties
were often present for
some weeks before the
dislocation was seen.
4. The number of reported
instances world-wide of
acute subluxation associated
with sporting activities
is very small. The incidence
of sports injuries of
this sort in the general
population also needs
to be defined.
5. By contrast there are
a number of reports of
subluxation associated
with endotrachael anaesthesia
and non-sporting trauma.
6. People with Down syndrome
should be fitted with
a soft neck collar before
anaesthesia or at the
time of an RTA to remind
everybody that they may
be at risk of acute AA
subluxation.
7. Neck x-rays taken in
routine x-ray departments
may give false negative
results and are likely
to identify only 60% to
80% of those with AAI.
8. Dr. Richard Morton
stated that neck x-rays
taken erect with the head
and neck in maximum flexion
are reliable in identifying
an increased AA distance.
However, this has not
been the experience at
the Manchester Children’s
Hospitals where experienced
radiographers found the
method to be unreliable.
9. There is no evidence
that increased AA distance
on x-ray identifies a
population at increased
risk of acute subluxation.
10. There are several
reports of acute subluxation
in people whose neck x-rays,
even taken in rigorous
conditions, have been
reported as normal.
11. There is no indication
that restricting sporting
activities involving neck
flexion in people with
Down syndrome, with or
without radiological abnormality,
will reduce the risk of
acute subluxation.
12. It is theoretically
possible, but unproven,
that in the long term,
continued participation
in activities associated
with repeated neck flexion
may predispose to the
neurological sequelae
of chronic instability.
Whether those with radiological
abnormality are more at
risk is not known. In
the short term there is
evidence that they are
not.
13. X-raying the neck
in people with Down syndrome
in order to identify AAI
does not currently fulfil
necessary criteria for
a screening programme
because:
14.
* Neck x-rays taken in
routine x-ray departments
may identify only 60-80%
of those with AAI.
* There is no intervention
with proven effect on
health care outcome.
* Counselling is rarely
available to alleviate
anxiety caused by screening
procedure.
15. Gait abnormality predicts
only 50% of those with
radiological instability
and excessive generalised
joint laxity predicts
only 10%.
16. Possible prodromal
indicators of risk for
subluxation or more serious
neurological sequelae
are: neck pain, restricted
movement, alterations
in gait, increasing reflexes,
upgoing plantars, deterioration
in bladder or bowel control.
Onset of any of these
in a person with Down
syndrome is an indication
for urgent referral to
an appropriate specialist.
Cervical
spine fusion in children
with Down syndrome has
been reported as carrying
a serious level of morbidity
and mortality. It should
be undertaken only as
a clinical necessity.
The
Down's Syndrome Association
is in the process of collating
the different views from
the presenters on that
day, and that publication
will be available from
the Down's Syndrome Association
in the next two or three
months. My personal view
is that screening children
with Down syndrome with
neck x-rays cannot be
recommended in the light
of the knowledge currently
available. But special
care needs to be taken
of children with Down
syndrome who have a general
anaesthetic (see 6 above).
You
will probably know that
currently the Department
of Health recommendation
is that children with
Down syndrome are recommended
to have a neck x-ray before
participating in "high
risk" sports. I can
report that representatives
of the Department of Health
were present at the symposium
and medical advisers from
the DSA have written to
Dr. Kenneth Calman, the
Chief Medical Officer,
to ask him if he would
reconsider department
advice in the light of
current knowledge.